South Africa – Bungeni Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:54:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 South Africa – Bungeni 32 32 UPDATE 1-Businesses in the South African Rand as the dollar falls, are sourcing lightly. Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:46:00 +0000

(Updates the rand; adds stocks, bonds)

JOHANNESBURG, June 4 (Reuters) – The South African rand strengthened on Friday and looked set for weekly gains, thanks to rising commodity prices and a weakening US dollar as investors turned to riskier but high yielding assets.

At 3:30 p.m. GMT, the rand was 1.16% firmer at 13.4725 to the dollar, trading at a new 28-month high.

The rand has advanced 2% this week and has gained more than 8% against the dollar this year so far.

“The rand strengthening bias remained broadly intact this week. … Most of the directional impetus came from the weakening US dollar and higher commodity prices which boosted South Africa‘s exports, ”said Kamilla Kaplan of Investec.

“At the same time, expectations of the United States (Federal Reserve) tolerating higher inflation and leaving monetary policy accommodative for a while have benefited high yielding assets. “

The dollar fell on Friday after data on non-farm wages in the United States showed hiring increased in May as the pandemic abated, but not as much as expected, tempering expectations that the Fed will tighten its policy. monetary policy as soon as possible.

Government bonds also strengthened and the yield on the instrument maturing in 2030 fell 12 basis points to 8.765%.

Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) shares partially reversed the previous day’s losses to end the week almost at the same level as it ended last Friday.

Stocks were mainly boosted by weaker-than-expected US employment data, which eased fears of an overheating economy and thus allayed fears that strong employment data would be strong. mean higher inflation in the weeks and months to come.

The benchmark all-stock benchmark FTSE / JSE edged up 0.05% to end the week at 67,825 points, while the blue-chip 40-largest companies index closed 0.07% higher at 61,617 points.

The gain was led by the mining and industrial sectors thanks to high commodity prices and strong momentum in technology stocks, mainly the heavyweight of the Naspers Ltd. index. Naspers finished up 0.33%. (Reporting by Olivia Kumwenda-Mtambo and Promit Mukherjee; editing by Jonathan Oatis)

Source link

South Africa reopens window for renewable energy boom Fri, 04 Jun 2021 05:01:01 +0000

South Africa is trying to ensure additional electricity production in a number of ways, but speed is key.

The Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) launched the Independent Renewable Energy Producer Supply Program (REIPPPP) tender window 5 in March.

It will end on August 16, 2021. Bidders may submit written questions about the round – asking for clarification on the Request for Proposal (RFP) until July 16. Offers must be registered by July 26.

Interested companies must pay a fee of R25,000 ($ 1,720) to access more details.

In previous cycles, the time between selection and financial close was nine months, with construction expected to take 24 to 36 months.

“This has been shortened, in accordance with the rules defined as part of the risk mitigation procurement cycle. Now there are four months left for financial close and a maximum of two years for construction, ”said Ashen Jugoo, Fasken partner in Johannesburg.

“Even though these are not emergency tenders, the pressure is to get hold of them as quickly as possible. Projects should be online within 28 months.

Modification of terms

The REIPPP program has been around for some time. The first round took place in 2011. The fourth round took place in 2015, but progress then stalled.

Despite this shutdown, South Africa has accumulated a lot of goodwill and certainty on the part of project developers.

Actis energy and infrastructure partner Barry Lynch described South Africa’s renewable energy program as “the best in the world” in the early years, while noting that things have changed. recently faltered.

“It’s such a clear and transparent process, it attracts the big guys and there is a lot of competition. It’s great for South Africa.

Lynch noted the strength of the market in South Africa, with strong financial backing. “The rules are dead and they make a lot of sense. They have everything investors want, ”he said.

“It will be very competitive. The winner will be South African consumers, ”said the head of Actis.

“There have been some changes since Round 4 of REIPPPP, in the form of a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), shifting some risks off the table to the private sector,” said Lara Bezuidenhoudt, partner of Fasken.

“If this had happened in the first round of REIPPPP it might have been unacceptable, but the government has built confidence in the previous four rounds and most of these differences are likely to be accepted by the private sector. .

Local needs

Jugoo said the government learned lessons from the risk mitigation procurement cycle in 2020.

“Empowerment score has been reduced from 30% to 10%, while price now counts for the remaining 90%. All other criteria are now qualifying criteria – you have to meet certain technical and legal factors to get into the score, ”he said.

In addition, the South African shareholding requirement has been increased to 49% and the participation of black women is to be 5%. “This concerns both the contracting authority and the contractors. This is a new and positive requirement, ”continued Jugoo.

The new documentation also puts more emphasis on compliance. “The efforts to combat corrupt practices have been greatly expanded,” he said.

Lynch noted the economic benefits of local manufacturing and local ownership. Actis is involved in “big projects” in rural areas of the country where unemployment is high.

To win

The supply window is in line with the ministry’s plan, which it presented in September 2020. The DMRE aims to subscribe a total of 11,813 MW from various sources, including renewables, storage, gas and coal. .

Within the framework of the offer window 5, the ministry aims to obtain 2,600 MW of electricity. This will cover 1,600 MW of onshore wind and 1,000 MW of solar photovoltaic (PV). The projects will be a minimum of 1 MW and up to 140 MW for onshore wind and 75 MW for solar photovoltaic.

One of the attractive factors is the range of opportunities in South Africa, said Lynch. The amount offered means that a developer has a better chance of winning work.

“It is necessary to balance the grid, too much wind for example could cause chaos,” said Bezuidenhoudt. “The challenge with producing charcoal was that it had to be distributed from an area northeast of Johannesburg to the rest of the country. Solar and wind provide an opportunity for a disaggregated grid.

Despite the new conditions, the interest is obvious.

“Only advanced projects will be put on the market during this fifth cycle. There are a lot of projects that have been built in the last four rounds that are in various stages of development. Some of these projects have even already been tendered, ”she said.

Jugoo agreed. “Despite the changes, we still hear about a large number of projects being tendered. Some developers are looking to bid on more than 10 projects. There are more than enough projects to resume the allocation of solar and wind power.

Stream search

South Africa needs electricity and the industry clearly wants to participate in the opportunities that present themselves. The lack of auction windows since 2015 – with the exception of the emergency cycle – has caused some problems.

“The new generation could be much more valuable to the country if there was a constant flow of IPP tours. When the REIPPPP started, new businesses were created and jobs were created. Due to the slowdown in the various rounds entering the market, some of these companies could not survive and jobs were lost, ”Bezuidenhoudt said.

Regular rounds to secure developers would help South Africa face its energy challenges. Neighboring countries could benefit from these lessons learned, such as Botswana, Lesotho, eSwatini and Namibia, she continued.

Recommended for you

AfDB to finance north-south transmission line in Angola

Source link

Patrimonial dispute engulfs site chosen for Amazon’s new African headquarters Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:27:00 +0000

For the Khoi and San – the original inhabitants of South Africa – a verdant patch of land in Cape Town embodies victory and tragedy.

The two communities drove Portuguese cattle raiders there in 1510. But, a century and a half later, it was there that the Dutch settlers launched a campaign of land dispossession.

Today, it is again the scene of another conflict, this time over a development whose construction is due to start this month and which will eventually house a new African headquarters of 70,000 square meters for the American retail giant Amazon. (AMZN.O)

“This is where the land was first stolen,” said Tauriq Jenkins, of the Goringhaicona Khoena Council, a traditional Khoi group opposed to the project. “We want a World Heritage Site. We don’t want 150,000 tonnes of concrete.”

The 15-hectare waterfront area previously housed a golf driving range and a popular bar – a small blue plaque is the only indication of its historical significance.

It is now earmarked for a R4 billion ($ 284 million) mixed-use development comprising a hotel, retail offices and residential units.

Amazon, which already employs thousands of people in Cape Town in a global call center and data hubs, is named as its main tenant, with no other big names yet to be disclosed by bosses or developers from the city.

While some groups have welcomed the prospect of new jobs, the whole project, not Amazon’s specific plans, has faced backlash from other community leaders as well as environmentalists and activists. . They have organized marches on the site and are now threatening to take the case to court.

According to the Observatory Civic Association, which represents a neighboring residential community, nearly 50,000 objections to the development have so far been filed with municipal and provincial authorities.

They want development to be stopped and the area declared a provincial or national heritage site; environmentalists say it’s important to preserve because it’s an environmentally sensitive area at the confluence of two rivers.

Amazon in South Africa and the United States declined to comment on the dispute and referred the queries to the developer, South African Zenprop. She in turn directed requests to Liesbeek Leisure Properties Trust (LLTP), the structure put in place to develop this specific project.

“There is no wave of discontent,” said Jody Aufrichtig of LLTP, noting that the development had gone through a wide public approval process.

“The remaining handful of vocal objectors, who were given the opportunity to participate, just don’t like the outcome.”


Land, history and ownership are thorny issues in South Africa, where memories of forced displacement and segregation remain fresh almost three decades after the end of apartheid.

These sensitivities were taken into account when reviewing the project, Cape Town Mayor Dan Plato said in a statement, announcing his approval of the development.

“We are keenly aware of the need to balance investment and job creation, as well as heritage and planning considerations,” he said, touting development as a much needed boost to the economy. Cape Town’s economy dependent on tourism and crippled by the pandemic.

The project will create thousands of new jobs, according to LLTP, while paying homage to Khoi and San culture and history.

The designs include an indigenous garden and a heritage center where LLTP’s Aufrichtig said the Khoi and San descendants will work as operators and educators.

Such efforts have succeeded in winning over some Khoi and San, including a group calling themselves the First Nations Collective, which engaged directly with the developers.

“We chose the cultural agency rather than the evil of the government deadlock to achieve the goal of creating a liberated area for our people,” said Zenzile Khoisan, spokesperson for the Collective.

Mayor Plato gave the project the green light in April after a two-year interim heritage protection order was issued to allow time to consider opposition to the project, which lapsed last year. And Aufrichtig said development is now expected to start in mid-June.

But opponents, like Martinus Fredericks, supreme leader of the Traditional Council! Aman (Nama), said they were not ready to give up. They still hope to force a review or blocking of the building permit through the courts.

“We are going to go to court,” he said. “We will mobilize every Khoi and San in the country to stop this development.”

($ 1 = Rand 14.0506)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source link

1Life, LifeQ and Samsung South Africa launch Covid-19 screening app as SA is set to enter wave 3 – Samsung Newsroom South Africa Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:05:32 +0000

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – June 02, 2021 – 1Life, in collaboration with LifeQ, using a Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 device, launched a first Covid-19 screening application in SA. It uses unique patterns derived from users’ biometric data to give them an indication of changes in their health, allowing consumers to take proactive precautions in the event of a potential outbreak of Covid-19, which is critical as the country faces to a potential of 3rd wave of infections. There is more and more evidence1 for the use of biometrics in the early detection of many physical conditions, and this Covid-19 solution is the first of many solutions that LifeQ plans to offer to consumers, athletes and people with acute and chronic illnesses.

The LifeQ Covid-19 app2 can signal the potential onset of Covid-19 in an individual entering the dangerous 48-hour period of viral shedding before symptoms manifest, which helps slow the spread of Covid-19 and could prove very useful in the pre-symptomatic detection of Covid-19 Infection, encouraging individuals to self-isolate sooner rather than later.

“Recent studies3 indicate that biometric data collected on wearable devices can be used as early warning indicators of Covid-19. There is a great opportunity here to empower consumers to make informed decisions using this data – helping them take precautions or seek medical help in time, ”said Laurence Hillman, CEO of 1Life. “With 1Life Pulse, which we launched last year, we have already made wearable devices and biometric data available to end users. The next step is to provide them with the LifeQ Covid-19 screening solution – giving them peace of mind about their well-being – letting them know they are doing well, but also alerting them to detected changes that may signal the appearance of Covid-19. “

“The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 is designed to accurately measure users’ heart rate, skin temperature and other physiological indicators. Combined with LifeQ’s unique software and models, data from the Galaxy Watch Active 2 can be used to help detect coronavirus infections days before an individual shows symptoms. It’s innovation in action and being able to provide South Africans with vital information before they even show symptoms enhances the power of technology in modern society and amplifies the value of wearable technology, ” said Justin Hume, director of integrated mobility at Samsung South Africa.

The LifeQ Covid-19 screening app aims to help contain virus transmission by alerting individuals to possible infection before symptoms appear through a combination of physiological monitoring combined with user feedback. Changes in physiology, detected by LifeQ, using data from the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2, alert individuals to these changes and allow them to provide contextual feedback through a web application. The app provides each person with a daily screening status to help guide their behavior and interactions with others. This helps them make informed decisions about self-isolation and testing.

“One of the biggest issues with Covid-19 is the time when you have the disease and not know it – not knowing whether you are passing it on to loved ones or coworkers. With this app, we hope to change that and give people the information they need to be proactive and slow the infection rate, ”said Christopher Rimmer, Chief Commercial Officer of LifeQ. “We are in control of so many aspects of our life, but when it comes to health – especially Covid-19 – we often feel helpless and anxious… until now. “

The app ensures that users can monitor their status to provide early indication of health changes and possible Covid-19 infection. It provides an easy way to find out how you are doing and if you might be progressing to the disease.

  • A green status indicates that you are doing well, that there seems to be no problem, and that you can continue your day as normal.
  • A yellow status signals that you need to exercise caution, adjust your behavior, and monitor yourself for symptoms within the next 1-2 days.
  • A red status indicates that you are not feeling well since you have reported symptoms or a positive Covid-19 test in the app.

The LifeQ Covid-19 app also gives users a pre-infection risk score which provides an indication of their risk of becoming seriously ill if they contract Covid-19.

“This type of proactive communication with the user around their health is revolutionary – not only to mitigate the risk of disease spread, but also to put the health of the individual and their contacts in their hands. We all know that when it comes to taking care of our health and well-being, prevention and early detection are essential, ”continues Hillman.

“There is no doubt that as we move forward we are learning more and more about Covid-19 and identifying better ways to prevent transmission beyond social and vaccination measures. As a company that is always striving to change people’s lives, we are extremely proud to be able to offer this app to our 1Life Pulse policyholders, ”said Hillman.

Disclaimer: It should be noted that the LifeQ Covid-19 screening app and supporting technology is not a diagnosis and should not be used as an official diagnosis for Covid-19. All medical and testing protocols should be followed according to local government guidelines.

Source link

Idris Elba Movie ‘Beast’ Adds Trio, Production Starts in South Africa – Deadline Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:37:00 +0000

South African actor Sharlto Copley, Iyana Halley and Leah Sava Jeffries joined the film Idris Elba Universal-Will Packer The beast, which started production in South Africa.

Elba plays Dr Nate Samuels, a recently widowed husband who returns to South Africa, where he first met his wife, on a long-planned trip with their teenage daughters to a game reserve run by a old family friend and wildlife biologist. But what begins as a journey of healing turns into a formidable struggle for survival when a rogue lion, a bloodthirsty poaching survivor who now sees all humans as enemies, begins to stalk them.

Sharlto Copley (Russian doll series, Maleficent) co-stars as Nate Samuels’ old friend, Martin Battles. Halley (The hate you give is us series) plays Samuels’ 18-year-old daughter, Meredith, and Jeffries (Rel series, Empire series) plays his 13-year-old daughter, Norah.

Beast, directed by Baltasar Kormákur, will be shot entirely in South Africa during a 10-week shoot in the rural Limpopo and Northern Cape provinces and in Cape Town. The feature film works in collaboration and cooperation with South African production services company Known Associates Entertainment (KAE) and the South African Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC).

Will Packer produces with James Lopez, president of Will Packer Productions. Ryan Engle (Unleashed, non-stop) wrote the script. Jaime Primak Sullivan and Bernard Bellew are EPs.

The beast hits theaters August 19, 2022.

Copley is represented by WME and Fourward. Halley is represented by Greene & Associates Talent Agency, Pallas Management Group and Del, Shaw, Moonves. Jeffries is represented by The Osbrink Agency, Level Talent Group and Fox Rothchild.

Source link

South Africa is one of the biggest arms suppliers to the Saudis during the Yemen war Tue, 01 Jun 2021 05:06:28 +0000

Relations between South Africa, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are on the rise – a source of shame for the South African state. Although profitable and important to the African economy, these relations are deeply linked to the arms trade and military trade of Arab nations involved in the war against Yemen, where several cases of human rights violations have occurred. been reported.

South Africa is a nation historically committed to the protection of human rights, and its national law prohibits military partnership with nations that violate these rights. This means that, in practice, the South African state publicly violates its own principles and prioritizes profit over law and human rights.

In order to right its historic mistake after decades of extremely racist policies, including segregation, South Africa strives to be a nation that upholds democratic and humanitarian principles. To this end, the country has a rigid constitutional doctrine on the defense of human rights, committing to fight against violations of these rights not only on its territory but also abroad.

South Africa’s Military Trade Act prohibits the supply of weapons to countries that use the equipment to violate human rights. However, precisely in the face of the contemporary world’s greatest humanitarian crisis, the war in Yemen, the posture of the South African government appears lenient and the African nation is becoming one of the Saudis’ biggest arms suppliers.

South Africa has gradually taken on the leading role in the arms and military equipment trade for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Despite the billionaire partnership, the government maintains its participation in several international campaigns to aid the Yemeni people, defending respect for human rights in the country, which has attracted the attention of many analysts.

Some commentators call the South African government “hypocrites” for this ambiguous position; others see the case as pure “real politics”, with intangible values ​​violated out of strategic necessity.

In fact, the conflict in Yemen is currently one of the most profitable ventures for the South African economy, explaining the notable growth in arms sales in the country. Trade in military equipment between South Africa, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in 2013 accounted for only 3% of total South African arms exports. The number rose to 42% in 2015 and 49% in 2016, a gigantic increase.

More recent data has not yet been released to the public, but it is estimated that across South Africa, South Africa has already profited from the sale of arms worth $ 550 million during the war. in Yemen.

The weapons sold to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are of different models and mainly include modern aerial equipment, such as drones, used by the Saudis in operations that have sparked controversy in international society for involving violations. visible human rights issues, such as attacks on civilians.

In addition to drones, mortars, armored vehicles and several types of bombs were frequently sold. Between 2019 and 2020, sales remained largely at a standstill due to issues with inspection rules, which were subsequently resolved.

Most of these weapons are manufactured by the South African company Rheinmetall Denel Munitions (RDM), which in 2016 opened a factory in Saudi Arabia, increasing the flow of goods without the high import costs.

It is important to note, however, that South Africa is just one of many countries that have benefited greatly from the humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

The US and UK are ahead of South Africans in arms sales, having earned billions of dollars from the war. Between 2015 and 2018, the United States sold more than $ 13 billion in arms to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The British, along the same lines, have received over $ 20 billion from Arab countries to send arms.

As criticism began to emerge against such a partnership due to human rights violations, the Trump administration maintained a stance of support for the Saudis. This stance has started to change drastically, however, with the rise of Biden, whose commitment to humanitarian standards is much greater. Not only did Biden temporarily block the arms trade for the Saudis, but he also sparked a serious diplomatic crisis with the Kingdom. U.S. arms sales to the UAE, currently under inspection, are also expected to cease.

The UK has also launched a campaign against this activity and the legality of trading with the Saudis is currently being debated in the courts and can be ended at any time. Yet Germany, which tracked sales to the US and UK, had already banned such a partnership three years ago. Earlier this year, Italy also banned all arms trade with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Unlike the Western nations, South Africa has continued to sell and increase its exports and it is likely to soon become the number one arms supplier to Arab nations, in the face of the crisis between these countries and the West. Today, South Africa’s potential is even greater, as the country will be able to maximize arms production and occupy the space of nations that have banned trade. But for that, changes will be necessary in the national legal structure.

South Africa’s actions will no longer go unnoticed in its trade with countries that commit humanitarian crimes in Yemen, as countries that have also supplied arms, in addition to banning their trade, will try to forward Africa from South the same way. By ignoring them, South Africa could make billions of dollars, but it will be breaking its own law. On the other hand, by banning trade, it will lose an important international partnership that cannot be ignored.

Most important, above international alliances, is that the South African government must be consistent with and respect its own rules. South African law is clear: the National Conventional Arms Control Committee, the government agency that regulates the arms trade, prohibits the sale of military equipment to nations that commit humanitarian crimes, applying the principles upheld by the country’s constitution. . And no nation can have its main economic activities in illegal trade.

Lucas Leiroz is a researcher in international law at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Protesters in Ontario block arms transport to Saudi Arabia

Source link

SA lose their citizenship Mon, 31 May 2021 12:44:18 +0000

Many South Africans who move elsewhere to work lose their South African citizenship without even knowing it. This is because there is an obscure law that requires you to report to the Home Office very early in the process of getting another passport. Dr Rory Jubber, Leader of the Democratic Alliance Abroad, explains how South Africans from all demographics – and many health professionals and health workers – find well-paying jobs elsewhere, but it does is done at the cost of South African citizenship. The DA has taken this issue to court; a judge is expected to rule in the next month or so. – Jackie Cameron

Dr Rory Jubber on citizens complaining about loss of South African citizenship:

For many years the Democratic Alliance Abroad (before my tenure as leader) received complaints from citizens about going to a consular office or Home Office office in London, are attempting to renew South African citizenship – only to find out that they are no longer South African citizens because they have claimed additional citizenship. The reason is that under the current South African Citizenship Law, you must first apply to the Home Office for permission to obtain another citizenship.

If you don’t, you are essentially deprived of your South African citizenship. You are no longer a South African citizen. The problem is that not all citizens were aware of it. In fact, it seems to number in the thousands – citizens who left and were granted additional citizenship, then suddenly found out that they are no longer South African citizens.

On whether they can regain their citizenship:

Technically, yes. But they should go back to South Africa [and live here] for a moment. You still have the right to permanent residence, but you are no longer a South African citizen.

On the importance of retaining citizenship while working outside South Africa:

I think there are several factors to this. It is above all a question of identity. People identify as South Africans. The passport, in many ways, means it to them. It is a question of citizenship that you were born with. People feel they have a right to this citizenship. The second point is [that] there are certain rights and privileges that come with citizenship. For example, a big one is [that] citizens abroad are allowed to vote in South African national elections. The problem is that the IC requires that if you want to vote abroad at an embassy or at the South African High Commission, you must produce both an ID and a passport.

If dual nationality has been taken away from you, it is clear that you are no longer able to vote. The main reason it is brought to court is that it ensures that we can get the case heard in the most rational way, to look at the arguments and try to force the Home Office to change the how he treats South Africans abroad. By appealing to the fact that certain sections of the Citizenship Act are unconstitutional, that they effectively take citizenship away from people – often without their knowledge.

We took the matter to the High Court a few Mondays ago. He was heard by the High Court and we are currently awaiting a judgment. Hopefully we will have it in the next few months to six weeks. I am relatively optimistic. The argument put forward by the Democratic Alliance is, I think, very strong. It is very well arranged. It is very clear why sections of the law that deprive people of their citizenship are unconstitutional. The DA has the well-known position of being able to advocate on behalf of citizens for their rights.

Why is the government doing this:

There have been a lot of skills lost to the rest of the world from all demographics – and increasingly from all demographics. South Africa should seek to maintain its links with these citizens, in the hope that the economic climate improves a bit – or through some incentive programs – you can get these citizens to come and help and support this effectively. which is a failing economy.

I think it is in the interest of the South African state. It should be seen as a good thing – you want to keep these people tied. I’m going to give you an example. In the early 2000s, the NHS (the National Health Care Service in the UK) went to South Africa and kicked out nurses from South Africa. There are thousands of South African nurses – mostly from poor backgrounds – living in the UK, working in the NHS because the pay they were offered was so good [that it was difficult to turn down.]

What is happening is that many of these people have received numerous complaints from nurses that they are losing their citizenship. Some of them want to go back to South Africa – yes, I know they have permanent residency, but that comes with all kinds of conditions. It makes things a little more sticky and difficult. Surely you want to keep these people interested in South Africa. Bring them back, especially at a time when the health department is in such dire straits. We must encourage the return of these people.

Read more:

(Visited 203 times, 203 visits today)

Source link

South Africa’s draft New Energy Vehicle Green Paper is a step in the right direction Sun, 30 May 2021 20:39:32 +0000

In 2019, we wrote an article sounding the alarm that South Africa’s inertia in pushing for electric vehicle adoption could cause it to miss the incredible opportunities offered by the electric vehicle revolution. The automotive assembly and automotive component manufacturing industry is one of the main pillars of the South African economy. South Africa-based assembly plants exported a record 387,092 vehicles in 2019, according to the automotive green paper released last week. The global economic slowdown induced by the coronavirus caused a sharp drop to 271,288 exported vehicles. This could be a temporary problem caused by a global pandemic, but a much bigger threat to this sector is already here and action is urgently needed. Apart from some Mercedes C-Class hybrid vehicles assembled in Port Elizabeth, the majority of vehicles exported from South Africa are ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles.

Image courtesy of Breev South Africa

South Africa hosts assembly plants for BMW South Africa, Ford Motor Company of Southern Africa, Isuzu South Africa, Mercedes-Benz SA, Nissan South Africa, Toyota South Africa Motors and Volkswagen Group South Africa. These factories and associated downstream industries employ over 100,000 workers and contribute over 7% of GDP. In 2020, total auto export revenue was R175.7 billion, with 58% of that revenue coming from exports to the UK and the EU. The UK was the premier destination for South African assembled vehicles, and it recently banned the sale of new ICE vehicles until 2030!

South Africa therefore has only 9 years to prepare its industry for this. It could actually take a lot less time than that if the transition to electric mobility happened much faster than most people realize. The UK saw the plug-in electric vehicle market share at 13.25% in April 2021, with a full electric system at 6.5% despite recent cuts in the government subsidy for plug-in cars. With more all-electric models coming to this market, along with a policy supporting the adoption of electric vehicles by fleet operators and businesses, such as the In-Kind Benefit Tax (BIK) and sacrifice schemes. salary, the market share of ICE vehicles could fall much faster. Therefore, to protect and increase its share of vehicles exported to the UK, South Africa needs to accelerate the shift to the assembly and manufacture of electric vehicles and associated components.

Source: SA Green Paper on New Energy Vehicles.

South Africa’s Green Paper doesn’t just focus on battery-electric vehicles. He also advocates the adoption of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and a green hydrogen economy (topics that we will ignore here). The Automotive Green Paper aims to address the key policy issues that will create and boost the production of electric vehicles and associated components locally while examining how to handle the delicate balance between completely disassembled kits for vehicles built in South Africa. and imports of vehicles completely built in South Africa. electric vehicles. The document also deals with the reduction of duties or their complete removal for EV components. The green paper is still open for comments and submissions close in early June.

Do you appreciate the originality of CleanTechnica? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician or Ambassador – or Patreon Sponsor.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or would like to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Source link

Matt Sates, 17, South African swims 1: 57.60 IM / 51.83 FL in Durban Sun, 30 May 2021 02:18:12 +0000

South African Grand Prix n ° 4 2021 – Durban

The fourth part of the 2021 South African Grand Prix is ​​underway in Durban. Three 17-year-old men marked the first of three preliminary / final sessions, including Matt Sates, who set two lifetime records both of which were under the FINA Olympic A Cup.

In the 200 IM, 17 years old 17 years old Matt Sates de SEAL lost 1.48 seconds off his season record clocking 1: 59.02 to reach 1: 57.60, moving into the top 15 in the world this season. Sates parted 25.14 / 29.93 / 34.32 / 28.21 in his evening prelims, which is now well under the FINA Olympic A Cup of 1: 59.67. Sates went on to win the final in 2: 02.74.

If Sates were American, he would rank No.3 all-time in 17-18 age group history, only behind Carson foster (1: 57.59, 2019) and Michael phelps (1: 55.94, 2003). The South African national record is 1: 57.03, set by Darian townsend at the French Championships 2009.

Sates hit his second Olympic A Cup in the 100 fly in the same session in a time trial, losing three-tenths of his 52.15 from RSA Nationals to go 51.83, swimming under the automatic qualifying standard 51 , 96. At the Cana stop of the 2021 South African Grand Prix series, Sates dominated the Olympian Chad le Clos 52.30 to 53.37.

Remaining No.13 in the 2020-2021 World Ranking was 17 years old Pieter Coetze in the 100 backstroke, who swam 54.31 to win the AM final after hitting 54.10 in the PM preliminaries. In the RSA 2021 domestic competition, Coetze swam 53.62 which reached the Olympic qualifying automatic cup of 53.85.

Coetze also scored a victory in the 50 fly. In the preliminary round, Coetze had the only run below 25 with 24.65, four tenths ahead of Alaric Bassoonfrom 25.05. Later in the finals, Coetze pushed back Basson by a tenth, taking the victory 25.25 to 25.35. Placing third was Brandon chapman from 0.01 s to 25.36.

Basson also swam in the 200 breaststroke, claiming an event victory in the final at 2: 15.44, improving from his preliminary effort of 2: 17.19 in the evening. Finishing 0.11 seconds apart for second and third place were Michael deans (2: 6.30 p.m.) and 15 years old Kian Keylock (2: 18.41).

Tokyo Olympian Tatjana Schoenmaker won the women’s 100 breaststroke in swimming 1: 06.88. Schoenmaker holds the South African national record in 1: 05.74, which ranks No.3 in the world rankings this season. Lara Van Niekerk placed second behind Schoenmaker in 1: 07.73, gaining four tenths of her preliminary swim in 1: 07.34.

Schoenmaker also swam the 200 freestyle, placing second in the prelims at 2: 04.55 behind 16-year-old Hannah Robertson (2: 04.05). In the AM final, it was Christin mundell (2: 04.56) who won the victory over Robertson (2: 05.94). Later, Mundell would win the 400 IM in 5: 01.91.

Another recent record in South Africa, Emma Chelius, won the women’s 50 freestyle at 25.20. Most recently, Chelius broke the national record at 24.72, automatically qualifying for the Tokyo Olympics. To complete the top three times, Olivia nel (25.94) and Rebecca meder (26.14). Nel also won the 50 backstroke at 29.04 while Meder hit 2: 14.32 in a 200 IM time trial.

Other highlights from day one:

  • Into the 200 fly, 17 years old Ethan du Preez swam a pair of 1: 57.85s on Friday night and Saturday morning. Earlier in the year, du Preez threw a lifetime record of 1: 56.16 before qualifying for the Tokyo Olympics in 1: 56.44 at the RSA Nationals.
  • In the men’s 50 breaststroke, the Tennessee teammate Michael houlie swam 27.68 to win the final after reaching 27.61 in the preliminaries.
  • Guy brooks led the men’s 100 freestyle preliminaries with 49.84, nearly a full second ahead of Matthew Bosch (50.80). However, in the final, Bosch took the victory by two hundredths over Brooks, 50.65 to 50.67.
  • In the men’s 400 freestyle, Brent Szurdoki set the fastest time in the preliminaries in 3: 53.95. Later in the final, Michael McGlynn (3: 56.56) narrowly held Henre Louw (3: 56.83) for the win.
  • The best swimming times in the 1,500 free events were Matthew Caldwell (16: 12.95) for men and Catherine van Rensburg (17: 10.32) for women.
  • After swimming 1: 00.20 in the women’s 100m butterfly preliminaries, Dune Coetzee broke a minute to win the final at 59.67.
  • In the 200 women’s backstroke, Hannah pearse shot the leader of the preliminaries Samantha Randle 2: 16.62 to 2: 16.93.

Source link

Fired for not wearing a mask at work – what South Africans should know Sat, 29 May 2021 06:33:45 +0000

More than a year after the start of the Covid-19 lockdown, many citizens have taken a lax approach to mask wearing, social distancing and disinfection.

However, a recent South Africa labor court ruling indicates that employers may, within reason, be able to fairly fire employees for failing to follow Covid-19 safety protocols, legal experts say. ENSafrica law firm.

Under the Disaster Management Act, subsection 70 (2) of the current Adjusted Alert Level 1 regulation provides that the wearing of a face mask is mandatory for anyone in a public place, except the exclusion of children under six years of age.

Despite this, a number of employers have tolerated anarchy, or rather the absence of masks, where employees are alone in their private offices, on the grounds that private offices are not “public places,” said ENSafrica.

“However, Regulation 70 (5) states that an employer may not allow any employee to perform duties or enter employment premises if the employee does not wear a face mask in the performance of his duties. functions.

“This regulation seems to suggest that employees should wear masks at all times while performing their duties, regardless of where the duties are performed.”

According to a strict interpretation of the regulation, this would include the case where an employee works remotely from his home. This is unlikely to be what the drafters of the regulation wanted, ENSafrica said.

However, the cabinet said failure to comply with these regulations would result in conviction, on conviction, of a fine or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both a fine and a imprisonment.

“From a compliance perspective, and to avoid any possible adverse conclusions if an inspection is conducted, the safest approach for employers would be to have a workplace policy that complies with Regulation 70 (5 ) and make it compulsory to wear a mask in all areas. , closed or open, private or public, on the employer’s premises, ”he said.

Legal precedent

ENSafrica recalled the recent judgment of Eskort Limited v Stuurman Mogotsi when the labor court concluded that the dismissal of an employee was fair, on the basis of:

  • Serious misconduct related to his failure to disclose to the employer that he has passed a Covid-19 test; and
  • Serious neglect in that even after receiving the positive results of his Covid-19 test, he failed to self-isolate and continued to report to work, putting the lives of his colleagues and their families at risk .

“In this case, the labor court sought to consider all the surrounding circumstances in their entirety before reaching a decision that the employee’s dismissal was fair,” ENSafrica said. He added that the following factors were taken into account:

  • The employee’s role as a member of the Covid-19 awareness committee in the workplace;
  • The employee’s negligence in failing to disclose the positive results of his Covid-19 test, thus putting the lives of colleagues and customers at risk;
  • The employee’s conduct while walking around without a mask and hugging colleagues after testing positive;
  • The employee’s nonchalant attitude.

So can you get fired?

In some cases, the the termination sanction may not be appropriate for mask-related transgressions – even if not wearing a mask is against national laws, ENSafrica said.

“For example, in circumstances where an employee hurriedly leaves their desk to pick up flyers and forgets to wear their mask and is seen and confronted by another employee three meters down the hall, but when confronted, the employee quickly apologizes and retrieves his mask and puts on it.

“In that case, the dismissal would probably be too severe and a verbal warning might be more appropriate or a simple reminder to be more vigilant.”

Employers whose disciplinary code prescribes the appropriate penalties for misconduct should be careful not to follow it blindly, the cabinet said.

“Dismissal does not automatically follow when the transgression amounts to a violation of the law. As with any other assessment of the appropriate sanction, factors such as the severity and impact of the transgression, as well as any remorse shown, should be taken into account.

“The seriousness of the transgression and the circumstances surrounding the Eskort case, however, most certainly justified the dismissal.

ENSafrica said employers and employees should be aware not to become jaded about Covid-19 compliance in the workplace.

“Employees need to understand that their non-compliance could have serious ramifications. However, taking into account the court’s warning to take Covid-19 compliance seriously, employers should also be aware of how they enforce compliance and impose disciplinary action for non-compliance.

“Employers should not rush to terminate the employment of violators and should ensure that the facts of the case justify a termination penalty.”

Commentary by Lauren Salt (executive) and Matlhatsi Ntlhoro (partner) of the law firm ENSafrica.

Read: Companies hardest hit by South Africa liquidations right now

Source link